Churchill Brothers
0 – 4
East Bengal FC
Dani Ramírez 2' · Edmund Lalrindika 45' · Bipin Singh Thounaojam 85' · Bipin Singh Thounaojam 90'
Sun 18 Oct 2026 · 17:00 ISTJawaharlal Nehru Stadium GoaRound 1FogReferee: Harish Kundu
At a glance
xG0.45 – 2.65
Shots (on target)13 (2) – 21 (7)
Possession
Churchill Brothers 47%East Bengal FC 53%
Accurate passes321 – 372
xG race
Hover or use arrow keys for minute-by-minute xG.
· dashed line: away · HT: half-time
Fair result?
Fair result · Actual result: East Bengal FC (80.8% likely)
Each non-own-goal shot with xG is treated as an independent Bernoulli chance; own goals have no xG and are excluded.Tale of the tape
Attack
Expected goals (xG)0.45
2.65
Total shots13
21
Shots on target2
7
Touches in opposition box15
35
Passing
Accurate passes321
372
Passes400
446
Accurate crosses2
1
Defending
Tackles17
18
Interceptions5
16
Clearances20
15
Keeper saves3
2
Discipline
Fouls committed10
10
Yellow cards3
1
Red cards0
0
Referee lens
Harish Kundu · 21 matches in FotMob's ISL record (snapshot)
Business as usual · This match was usual on the whistle and usual with the cards.
Fouls
20.020.1220.58
match · referee avg · league avg · usualYellow cards
4.04.194.19
match · referee avg · league avg · usualCards per foul
0.20.210.2
match · referee avg · league avg · usual this match referee league
Per-team split
Churchill BrothersFouls 10.0Yellow cards 3.0
East Bengal FCFouls 10.0Yellow cards 1.0
The match served up 20.0 fouls and 4.0 yellow cards: business as usual.
Small sample: one match proves nothing.How we judge this
FotMob referee figures are a snapshot captured when the match was fetched, not a historical record frozen at kick-off. “Fewer”, “about usual”, and “more” use an 80% Poisson band: expected count ± 1.28 × √expected. The whistle test compares match fouls with the referee average; the pocket test scales the referee's yellow-card rate to this match's foul count.
Fan poll
Home 30% · Draw 21% · Away 49% · 994 votes · Actual result: East Bengal FC
The crowd called it
Share this match
Download imageChurchill Brothers 0-4 East Bengal FC. xG says 0.45-2.65. Fair result? Fair result. https://joyan9.github.io/isl-data/6361999.htmlAI-generated notes, may contain errors
- East Bengal’s 2.65 expected‑goals (xG) shows they had chances worth roughly 2 ½ goals, and they turned them into 4 real goals – a clear sign that their shots were not only more frequent but also higher quality; Churchill Brothers, with just 0.45 xG, failed to score any of their 13 shots.
- Despite a modest 53 % possession advantage, East Bengal produced 21 shots versus Churchill’s 13, with 14 of those inside the box and 13 on target compared to Churchill’s 4 inside‑box shots and only 2 on target – a 13‑to‑2 on‑target ratio that explains the scoreline.
- Passing numbers were close (443 vs 400), yet East Bengal delivered 372 accurate passes out of 446 (≈83 % accuracy) versus Churchill’s 321 of 400 (≈80 %); the extra accurate passes helped them create the higher‑quality chances reflected in their xG.
- The team that generated more big chances (East Bengal’s 4 vs Churchill’s 2) also recorded more corners (3 vs 1) and offsides (5 vs 2), indicating a more aggressive attacking style that translated into the four‑goal haul.
- Star striker Bipin Singh Thounaojam’s two goals (rating 8.92) came from 4 shots, far above the team’s expected 0.7 xG for him, showing a player who capitalized exceptionally well on the quality chances the side created.