Punjab FC
Gurkirat Singh 90'
1 – 1
Mumbai City FC
Leandro Otormín 65'
Mon 19 Oct 2026 · 19:30 ISTJawaharlal Nehru StadiumRound 1FogReferee: Surojit Das
At a glance
xG1.02 – 1.27
Shots (on target)17 (3) – 11 (4)
Possession
Punjab FC 58%Mumbai City FC 42%
Accurate passes386 – 250
xG race
Hover or use arrow keys for minute-by-minute xG.
· dashed line: away · HT: half-time
Fair result?
Could've gone either way · Actual result: Draw (21.6% likely)
Each non-own-goal shot with xG is treated as an independent Bernoulli chance; own goals have no xG and are excluded.Tale of the tape
Attack
Expected goals (xG)1.02
1.27
Total shots17
11
Shots on target3
4
Touches in opposition box16
13
Passing
Accurate passes386
250
Passes479
349
Accurate crosses6
6
Defending
Tackles11
25
Interceptions7
18
Clearances14
25
Keeper saves3
2
Discipline
Fouls committed13
11
Yellow cards0
0
Red cards0
0
Referee lens
Surojit Das · 9 matches in FotMob's ISL record (snapshot)
Cards stayed in the pocket · This match was usual on the whistle and fewer with the cards.
Fouls
24.02120.55
match · referee avg · league avg · usualYellow cards
0.03.674.18
match · referee avg · league avg · fewerCards per foul
0.00.170.2
match · referee avg · league avg · usual this match referee league
Per-team split
Punjab FCFouls 13.0Yellow cards 0.0
Mumbai City FCFouls 11.0Yellow cards 0.0
The match served up 24.0 fouls and 0.0 yellow cards: cards stayed in the pocket.
Small sample: one match proves nothing.How we judge this
FotMob referee figures are a snapshot captured when the match was fetched, not a historical record frozen at kick-off. “Fewer”, “about usual”, and “more” use an 80% Poisson band: expected count ± 1.28 × √expected. The whistle test compares match fouls with the referee average; the pocket test scales the referee's yellow-card rate to this match's foul count.
Fan poll
Home 25% · Draw 49% · Away 26% · 4,263 votes · Actual result: Draw
The crowd called it
Share this match
Download imagePunjab FC 1-1 Mumbai City FC. xG says 1.02-1.27. Fair result? Could've gone either way. https://joyan9.github.io/isl-data/6362001.htmlAI-generated notes, may contain errors
- Punjab held a 58 % possession advantage but Mumbai City’s expected goals (1.27) were still 0.25 higher than Punjab’s (1.02).
- Punjab fired 17 shots (9 on target) versus Mumbai’s 11 shots (6 on target), yet both teams finished with a single goal.
- Leandro Otormín, whose single goal matched an expected‑goals rating of 0.89, and Gurkirat Singh, who scored on a 0.63 expected‑goal chance, both delivered on their xG.
- Punjab’s 386 accurate passes outpaced Mumbai’s 250, yet this passing dominance didn’t translate into a higher xG.
- Each side created one “big chance” (Punjab and Mumbai both had one), and the 16‑point possession gap ended in the same 1‑1 result.